Moving further into a challenging 2016, investors remain apprehensive about the global financial outlook and they are in the process of accepting the new state of markets, which is the low-returns in equities and fixed income. Extensive QE and negative interest rates inflate the markets and constitute the main reasons for the low-yielding scenery and for the rise of alternative investment allocations. Institutions like insurance companies and banks find themselves amid a difficult situation making alternative income-producing strategies appealing. Political issues add uncertainty to the ever-changing status of markets, such as the ongoing Greek debt and the upcoming Brexit referendum and concurrent U.S. elections. Even earnings in big corporations are lowering, signalling the need for rebalancing portfolios and shifting to alternative investments.
Alternative investments constitute a broad category, but this perspective focuses on three asset classes: hedge funds, private equity and private debt. Hedge funds constitute the most debated and controversial asset class gathering the lights of publicity for numerous reasons. With over $3.23tn of assets under management according to BarclayHedge and over 5 thousand institutional investors, hedge funds are considered to be the elite of money managers charging the infamous 2/20 structure to their investors. There is a lot of discussion since the beginning of 2016 regarding high fees and bad performance indicating the upcoming reshaping of the industry following the divesting of major pension funds. Despite, the exodus of big names in the institutional spectrum, more and more pensions are attracted to hedge funds according to Preqin research, which contrasts the recent assaults on the asset class.
Private equity, on the other side, is probably the biggest player in the “allocation battlefield” with assets under management exceeding $4.2tn and with investor appetite for the well established asset class. Private equity constitutes the biggest enemy of hedges funds in attracting capital and identifying investment opportunities. Private equity seems to be more appealing to long-term investors due to the illiquidity offered, which allows to realise higher returns than their peers in the hedge fund space.
The last case is private debt, which is a nearly $500bn asset class and one of the most intriguing in the investment arena. Private debt is looking to capitalise new opportunites created by the global economic outlook and offers investors an amazing tool for diversification and downside protection as it is collateralised by real assets. Due to the nature of business, investors know what to expect in terms of returns and the asset class is growing steadily alongside the investor appetite as seen below.
Potential comeback from banks regarding lending especially in the SMEs area could only prove beneficial for the direct lending arena, because it will help the asset class become bigger, more competitive and sustainable. Apart from banks and insurers, pension funds could find a great fit for their asset liability matching portfolios due to the illiquidity of several private debt funds, which is a crucial consideration due to the risky nature of this business. The Dodd-Frank Act and AIFMD provide investors with confidence when it comes to investing in such funds due to the stringent compliance and risk management rules.
Private debt is positioned strategically somewhere in the middle field between the battling alternative asset classes of hedge funds on one side, with mostly up to monthly liquidity for single managers and up to quarterly for fund of hedge funds, and illiquid private equity on the other side, with typical 5, 7 and 10 year terms plus potential yearly extensions e.g. in real estate. The fee model is lower than the 2/20 in hedge funds and private equity and more tight to the long only fixed income fund space with performance fees. In general, we recognise a melting pot of alternatives and particularly private debt and direct lending strategies demonstrate how hedge funds and private equity are growing together. Mostly long only, un-levered and with low volatility, those strategies seem to assist family offices, fund of funds and slowly as well institutionals like pensions, insurers and sovereign wealth in the search for yield. Most of the largest GPs in PE have long opened private debt strategies and various credit and high yield related hedge funds started direct lending into corporates, speciality finance, trade finance, consumer credit and real estate. Extensive due diligence is required in analysing direct lending strategies, as not only the underlying lending activity to individual, firm or transaction, but as well the level of debt as LTV and the seat in the capital structure from senior secured, mezzanine, convertible, unitranche or preferred equity requires dedicated credit experience and structuring capabilities combined with extensive risk management, credit scoring, restructuring and workout experience. Plenty of direct lenders do not posses a credit scoring mechanism, are unregulated as no formal registration is yet required and particularly in the online peer-to-peer (P2P) and marketplace lending space follow 'no cherry picking' policies from senior management down to the credit analysts. Those policies combined very low decline rates of loan applications - meaning almost every applicant gets a loan - lead to volume based lending practices, in part comparable with with pre-crisis 'originate-to-distribute' subprime mortgage lending, but now from non-bank lenders in the shadow banking system. Certain direct lending strategies provide liquidity like hedge funds and face an underlying asset and liability mismatch in their portfolios. In stressed markets, investors will want to redeem their investments according to liquidity provision in the fund prospectus, but will likely have to queue with their peers until GP's have liquidity available. The direct lending market has risen 100-150% p.a. since 2009 on both sides of the Atlantic and a recent resurrection of bank senior loan provision to lending funds combined with the securitisation of marketplace and P2P loans in the US and Europe for funding purposes, with the engagement of tier 1 rating agencies, seems like a recipe for upcoming stress in this industry. From an investor perspective, private debt and direct lending are welcome sectors with high yielding and low volatility strategies. Extensive investment and operational due diligence is required in order to survive periods with stressed solvency levels during the next credit cycle turn, as the direct lending space has not yet been tested in a downward credit market.
This perspective aims at analysing three of the major asset classes inside the alternative investment space, which provide investors with options for diversification and return enhancement amid a changing and low-yielding economic environment. This analysis will be different if the upcoming political scenery changes with specific mentioning of a potential Brexit.
This perspective is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of an offer to buy an interest in any investment or advisory service by Stone Mountain Capital LTD. For queries please contact Alexandros Kyparissis under email: firstname.lastname@example.org and Tel.: +44 7843 144007. For further information around our research and advisory services please contact Oliver Fochler under email: email@example.com and Tel.: +44 7922 436360.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of, and should not be attributed to, Stone Mountain Capital LTD. Readers should refer to the Disclaimer.