​Throughout 2025, the US macroeconomic environment was characterised by a gradual normalisation following the post-inflation shock period of prior years. Inflation was largely brought under control, consistently hovering in a narrow 2-3% range - still above the Federal Reserve’s formal 2% target, but sufficiently contained to reduce its dominance in policy deliberations. As price pressures stabilised, the Fed progressively shifted its focus towards labour-market dynamics, with unemployment emerging as the marginal variable guiding monetary policy decisions. During the first half of the year, policymakers remained deliberately cautious, refraining from early rate cuts amid concerns that premature easing could reignite inflation, particularly given still-historically strong employment conditions, even as unemployment began to trend higher. This stance changed in the autumn and winter months, when a clearer softening in labour markets, combined with inflation remaining at tolerable levels, provided the Fed with sufficient confidence to pivot. Over this period, the central bank implemented three 25 basis-point rate cuts, signalling a controlled transition towards a more accommodative stance while maintaining credibility on inflation containment.

​So far, 2025 has been shaped by sharp swings in financial markets, driven by geopolitical shocks, shifting monetary policy expectations, and evolving macroeconomic conditions. The year began with strong risk appetite, fuelled by optimism over disinflation and AI-led corporate growth, but momentum faltered in April when the US announced sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs, reigniting fears of a global trade war. Equity markets corrected sharply before stabilising in early summer, supported by resilient corporate earnings and easing volatility. Inflation has proven stickier than expected in most major economies, prompting central banks, especially the Fed and the BoE, to delay or temper rate-cut expectations. The US dollar weakened in the first half of the year, boosting gold prices to multi-year highs as investors sought safe-haven assets. Overall, 2025 has presented a complex mix of resilience and risk, leaving investors to navigate an unusually uncertain macroeconomic and geopolitical backdrop.
Inflation trends in 2025 have underscored the challenge facing central banks in the United States, the Euro Area, and the United Kingdom, with price pressures proving more persistent than policymakers had anticipated. In the US, headline CPI has eased from its 2022 and 2023 peaks but remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. While core inflation has been slower to decline, driven by stubborn services and shelter costs. The Euro Area has seen a similar pattern, with headline inflation moderating on the back of lower energy prices but core readings staying elevated due to wage growth and resilient domestic demand. The UK has faced the stickiest inflation among the three, with both headline and core measures remaining well above target despite easing commodity costs—reflecting underlying pressures in the labour market and housing sector. As shown in Figure 1, inflation has come down substantially since 2023, the Euro Area is the only geography of the three that has maintained an inflation rate at or below 2% for multiple months. In contrast, the UK’s inflation rate has begun to soar again and remains well above 3% in recent months.
Interest rate policy has reflected these dynamics, with the Fed and the BoE both delaying widely expected rate cuts as inflation progress slowed in the first half of the year. The Fed has maintained rates at close to their multi-year highs, emphasising the need for sustained evidence of disinflation before easing. The BoE has lowered its interest rates more steadily in 2025 than the US, but the country has to balance cuts with currently rising inflation. In contrast, the European Central Bank has begun to signal a cautious easing path, supported by weaker growth data and a more pronounced decline in headline inflation across the bloc. Elsewhere, Japan’s policy shift away from ultra-loose conditions has stood in sharp contrast, underscoring the divergence in global monetary stances and adding a further layer of complexity to capital flows and currency markets in 2025.

​In early April 2025, President Trump reignited trade tensions with sweeping tariffs - 10% on all imports and up to 50% for countries with "unfair" practices, hitting China hardest at 145%. China retaliated with up to 125% tariffs, blacklisting US firms and restricting exports of rare earths. Facing global backlash, Trump announced a 90-day delay for most countries (excluding China) and eased tariffs on key sectors like tech and pharma. Markets, initially hopeful over pro-business policies, turned volatile as concerns over aggressive trade moves mounted. The VIX spiked to 60 on Liberation Day - levels not seen since 2008 and 2020. Upon the delay of the tariff implementation, volatility eased quickly, as shown in Figure 1. Volatility levels have dropped to below 25, which is only slightly elevated compared to historical levels.

​Last week, President Donald Trump reignited global trade tensions by continuing his tariff policy. During “Liberation Day,” the President announced a sweeping plan, imposing a baseline 10% tariff on all imports and sharply escalating tariffs on countries deemed to have unfair trade practices. For those countries, tariffs of up to 50% were announced. China was hit hardest, with tariffs reaching as high as 145%. While many countries chose to limit retaliatory measures and instead focus on reaching an agreement with the US, China imposed matching tariffs of up to 125% on US products, blacklisted several American companies, and restricted exports of key materials. The latter includes rare earth metals, which are crucial in today’s world as they are vital for many technological products. In response to global backlash, Trump announced a 90-day delay on the tariff increases for most countries (excluding China), attempting to contain diplomatic fallout while maintaining a tough stance on trade imbalances. Amid further concerns that tariffs on key growth-spurring sectors such as technology and pharma could backfire, the administration announced additional reprieve by limiting tariffs on such critical goods.